Skip to content

In Udon, Red Villages Grow into Red Districts

2011 November 19
by The Isaan Record

UDON THANI – As Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra is losing popular support, facing fierce criticism for her management of the massive floods plaguing Bangkok, her strongest supporters, the Red Shirts, are finding new ways to strengthen their movement and prepare for the worst. With fears of a looming coup, Red Shirt leaders in Udon Thani are quietly launching a project to consolidate their constituents. Just recently, they began inaugurating entire Districts as Red territory.

“We don’t know if there is going to be a coup or not,” said Sa-ngad Hanarong, a villager from Prajak Silapakhom, a freshly named Red District. “But the purpose [of the Red District] is not to fight. The purpose is to be stronger and keep track of what’s actually going on.”

Prajak Silapakhom was inaugurated as a Red District on October 9. The district, on the outskirts of the city of Udon Thani, is comprised of a total of 41 villages, all of which are Red. Since then, nearby Non Sa-at was the second district to celebrate its Red inauguration on November 1.

The Red District project is an expansion of the Red Village movement that saw hundreds of villages across the Northeast officially title themselves Red Villages for Democracy. But while the Red Villages were scattered shows of support, the Red Districts boast specific objectives and a newfound network of local leaders.

According to Ms. Ratanawan Suksala, the mastermind behind the Red District model, the project is organized around three main goals. It seeks to teach democratic values, initiate anti-drug campaigns, and promote village-level entrepreneurship.

To promote education about democracy, with each inauguration ceremony, for example, comes a two-day lecture series from pundits and Red Shirt leaders. But once the festivities come to a close, so too does this informal schooling.

For Ms. Ratanawan, a former secretary to Member of Parliament (MP) Surathin Pimanmekin and a current consultant to the Red Radio station 106.75, it is the network created by the Red District that helps unify the movement’s goals even more.

“[Before Prajak Silapakhom District was inaugurated,] some people were confused…and influenced by different ideas. But since we have started the Red District, the people seem like they understand more what we are doing,” she said. “I feel like we’re walking together in the same direction.”

In some ways, the model does encourage democratic practices at a local level. Each village is asked to elect ten representatives who attend meetings and relay messages between their constituents and other Red Shirts. And each village also gathers to vote on a local entrepreneurial project.

“I feel like we know more about democracy now. I realize how much I can do,” reflected one Red District resident.

In order to stave off drug use, the Red District model also encourages each village to establish a network of local guards to monitor drug presence in the village. “We’ll hire them on shifts and pay them as guards. We want to give them the responsibility of a job and teach them that working is better [than unemployment],” said Ms. Ratanawan about her future plans. She aims to find funding through private donations.

Anti-drug campaigns are a touchy subject for the Red Shirts after exiled former Prime Minister and Red Shirt icon Thaksin Shinawatra instigated the most violent anti-drug campaign in Thai history that left 2,500 citizens dead. But in Baan Phonthong, Mr. Sa-ngad’s village in Prajak Silapakhom District, there is little concern.

“Everyone is welcoming of this [anti-drug campaign] because we have a plan. If we find people who are doing drugs we want to send them to rehab therapy,” Mr. Sa-ngad explained.

As for the local entrepreneurship stimulus program, the Red District model encourages each village to vote on one product that its residents believe they could create and sell at the greatest profit. Then, the residents focus their resources on producing their chosen good. The program mimics Mr. Thaksin’s successful One Tambon One Product (OTOP) program that encouraged each sub-district, known in Thai as a tambon, to do the same.

Ms. Ratanawan, however, claims that her project is much stronger since it can more effectively distribute profits. She hopes that ultimately villages will petition the government for stimulus money that can prop up their entrepreneurial pursuits. Mr. Sa-ngad’s village has voted to produce woven reed mats while his friends in the next village are focusing on mudmee silk.

But it is not just Udon Thani that is moving towards the Red District model. “Any province can do the same as long as they are Red Shirts and they stick to the same principles,” Ms. Ratanawan said.

Indeed, MPs and provincial Red Shirt representatives from Roi Et, Kalasin, and Khon Kaen have also begun planning to integrate their Red Villages into Red Sub-districts and Districts.

“When people [in Red Districts] get together and work together…they feel stronger and more united. What our country lacks is a sense of unity,” Khon Kaen MP and Red District proponent Thanik Masripitak said. Just last week, Mr. Thanik led a meeting of close to 300 Khon Kaen Red Village representatives to talk about the reconfiguration. At the request of the rice farmers and agricultural workers that make up the majority of these Red villagers, further meetings, he explained, will be postponed until after the rice harvest.

And though the Red District movement is gaining traction amongst many MPs, not everyone is happy with the shift.

Kwanchai Praipana, a prominent Udon Thani Red Radio DJ, part of the Red movement’s old guard and a man whom Ms. Ratanawan laughingly calls her “enemy,” thinks the move is just a way for Pheu Thai MPs to consolidate the power of the Red Shirt movement.

“Representatives want to have the masses on their side,” he said in an interview last month. “That’s why they do this. They take the Red Shirts who are not as truly passionate about democracy onto their side.”

Mr. Kwanchai’s alternative to the Red District movement takes the power away from Parliamentary Representatives and keeps it in the hands of the people, he claims. The so-called “Udon Lovers Model” encourages villagers to join Mr. Kwanchai’s Khon Rak Udon club (for a monthly fee) so they can meet at local radio stations and coffee shops to discuss the political matters of the day.

“Setting up Red Shirt villages – why is that important? It just interferes,” Mr. Kwanchai said.

For Mr. Thanik, however, Kwanchai’s grousing is little more than personal vanity. “As far as I know, Kwanchai doesn’t support the Red Villages because he’s afraid it’s going to steal his thunder,” the Khon Kaen MP said. Where Kwanchai looks to expand the Udon Model throughout the Northeast, Mr. Thanik thinks that does little more than maintain the status quo. “Just because we’ve won [the election] doesn’t mean we should stop. We should draw attention to who we really are and what more we can do.”

It’s what these Red Districts can do, though, that has got some people worried. Establishing a system of civil-society institutions that, in some ways, parallel pre-existing governmental mechanisms can appear to be a direct threat to the Bangkok establishment. What message does it send when a populist, self-proclaimed pro-democracy movement sees it fit to do its own policing, found its own local craft co-operatives, and develop its own political curricula?

The Red villagers of Baan Phonthong, however, know exactly what message they want to send. Speaking on behalf of an assembled crowd of 40 villagers, Mr. Sa-ngad told reporters that, “Everyone would like to say that we’re waiting for the day when we own our real freedom… And we want Thaksin back as soon as possible!”

Though the organization of Red villagers is being reshuffled and expanded, their battle cry remains the same.

5 Responses leave one →
  1. November 19, 2011

    As Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra is losing popular support, facing fierce criticism for her management of the massive floods plaguing Bangkok, her strongest supporters, the Red Shirts, are finding new ways to strengthen their movement and prepare for the worst. With fears of a looming coup…

    I think that’s the Bangkok MSM echo chamber speaking. Certainly no one’s happy about the massive flood damage, but the Abac poll showed that 3 of 4 Thais know that no Thai government is likely to have done better at handling it than the present one… although a Democrat Party government would surely have gotten the support of the MSM. As well, better than 9 of 10 Thais said that a coup was definitely NOT desirable. And 9 of 10 Thais are not certainly not members of the Shinawatra faithful.

    Establishing a system of civil-society institutions that, in some ways, parallel pre-existing governmental mechanisms can appear to be a direct threat to the Bangkok establishment. What message does it send when a populist, self-proclaimed pro-democracy movement sees it fit to do its own policing, found its own local craft co-operatives, and develop its own political curricula?

    This is the Hezbola/Hamas model that’s been so successful in the Middle East. I hope that the armed component will never be necessary in Thailand. But establishing a parallel, democratic regime is exactly what is required, so that it can just move one step sideways when power is won at the polls by the very same people who build the democratic alternative and power is constitutionally distributed to the people.

    I wonder how prevalent is Mr Sa-ngad’s attitude… Waiting for Godot in Thaksin’s clothing.

    Building their own democratic villages and districts ought to empower the people themselves, if all the people do is wait for Thaksin to come back the whole exercise is a wasted effort and not democratic at all.

    I have faith in the Thai people. I think they know that the only ones who have their interests at heart are themselves. Certainly no billionaire does. Only those looking out exclusively for Number One are billionaires.

  2. Sam Deedes permalink
    November 23, 2011

    This seems to be a very significant development. It has legs (though I agree with john francis lee that it should have no arms!)

    There is still the issue to be addressed as to the security or otherwise of those living in the red districts who do not subscribe 100% to the red philosophy. Is there enough democratic space for them?

    I hope the leaders of the red shirts are familiar with and supportive of “How to Start a Revolution”, the electrifying film about Gene Sharp’s work on non-violent action.

    • November 24, 2011

      “Those who do not subscribe 100% to the red philosophy…”

      Is the ‘red philosophy’ Thaksinism, as the MSM projects?

      Is the ‘red philosophy’ democracy, self-determination?

      I subscribe to the latter. In which case those who do not subscribe 100% to anything are pretty much the norm.

      I agree that there will always be groups trying to co-opt democracy. That’s mission number one in a democracy… preventing that happening. Democracy is not a spectators’ sport, it requires hands-on participation.

      Look to the USA for a present negative example… although there are stirrings now with OWS of a renaissance of democracy in my USA, inspired in part by the red shirts of Thailand and others.

  3. November 24, 2011

    I just noticed an article at Inter Press Service News (IPS) (rss link), Millions Stand to Benefit from Farmers’ Co-ops which mentions that the UN has declared 2012 to be the International Year of Cooperatives.

    Also mentioned by IPS is the University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives, which states that

    These seven cooperative principles have been developed and modified over time, and are generally accepted by cooperatives worldwide.

    1. Voluntary and Open Membership
    2. Democratic Member Control
    3. Member Economic Participation
    4. Autonomy and Independence
    5. Education, Training and Information
    6. Cooperation among Cooperatives
    7. Concern for Community

    The red villages and red districts might well take advantage of the bow wave created by the UN and porpoise ahead with their formation of cooperatives here in Thailand.

  4. December 10, 2011

    As Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra is losing popular support…

    I think PM Yingluck is losing popular support, but not on account of the floods or for any of the reasons trumpeted by the ancien régime.

    Rather, people would be happy to support PM Yingluck… if she began to act like a PM.

    But she is apparently no more than a figurehead for a Phuea Thai party run by Chalerm, Royal Thai Air Force Group Captain Anudith, and others more cowardly, vicious, opportunistic, and reactionary than the Democrat/Royal Thai Army/PAD putsch the Phuea Thai regime was expected to replace.

    Yingluck’s only hope of hanging on lies in championing the cause of those who elected her, lies in firing Chalerm and Anudith and the other cynical opportunists and outright authoritarian proxies in ‘her’ government, lies in confronting and facing down The Grand Inquisitors, lies in making ‘her’ government… her own.

    She needs to dance with those who brought her to the ball.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS